Assessing the appropriateness of community-based antibiotic prescribing in Alberta, Canada, 2017-2020, using ICD-9-CM codes: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance is a rising threat to human health, and, with up to 90% of antibiotics prescribed in the community, it is critical to examine Canadian antibiotic stewardship practices in outpatient settings. We carried out a large-scale analysis of appropriateness in community-based prescribing of antibiotics to adults in Alberta, reporting on 3 years of data from physicians practising in the province. METHODS: The study cohort was composed of all adult (age 18-65 yr) Alberta residents who filled at least 1 antibiotic prescription written by a community-based physician between Apr. 1, 2017, and Mar. 6, 2020. We linked diagnosis codes from the clinical modification of the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9-CM), as used for billing purposes by the province's fee-for-service community physicians, to drug dispensing records, as maintained in the province's pharmaceutical dispensing database. We included physicians practising in community medicine, general practice, generalist mental health, geriatric medicine and occupational medicine. Following an approach used in previous research, we linked diagnosis codes with antibiotic drug dispensations, classified across a spectrum of appropriateness (always, sometimes never, no diagnosis code). RESULTS: We identified 3 114 400 antibiotic prescriptions dispensed to 1 351 193 adult patients by 5577 physicians. Of these prescriptions, 253 038 (8.1%) were "always appropriate," 1 168 131 (37.5%) were "potentially appropriate," 1 219 709 (39.2%) were "never appropriate," and 473 522 (15.2%) were not associated with an ICD-9-CM billing code. Among all dispensed antibiotic prescriptions, amoxicillin, azithromycin and clarithromycin were the most commonly prescribed drugs labelled "never appropriate." INTERPRETATION: We found that nearly 40% of prescriptions dispensed to 1.35 million adult patients in Alberta's community-based settings over a 35-month period were inappropriate. This finding suggests that additional policies and programs to improve stewardship among physicians prescribing antibiotics for adult outpatients in Alberta may be warranted.

Evaluación del consumo de antibióticos en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos desde 2016 a 2020 en un hospital de segundo nivel / Evaluation of the anti-bacterial agents compsumption in the Intensive Care Unit from 2016 to 2020 in a second-level hospital

Objetivo: La monitorización del consumo de antimicrobianos en los hospitales es una medida necesaria para evaluar el uso racional de estos medicamentos. El indicador principal para realizar esta monitorización y conocer la presión o exposi-ción de los antimicrobianos a nivel hospitalario es la dosis diaria definida (DDD) por cada 100 estan-cias y día (e-d). El objetivo principal es analizar la evolución de la utilización de antibióticos en una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos (UCI) de un hospital de segundo nivel a lo largo de 5 años.Métodos: Estudio observacional, retrospectivo que analiza el consumo de antibióticos en la UCI, rea-lizando una comparativa con respecto a los datos globales del hospital, utilizando como unidad de medida las DDD/100 e-d.Resultados: Se incluyeron 28 medicamentos, co-rrespondientes a 25 principios activos. La media de consumo hospitalario global fue de 67,98; ascen-diendo a 89,17 en la UCI. Se tiende a reducciones en los consumos hasta 2020, donde despuntan antibióticos como azitromicina o ceftriaxona. En la UCI los más consumidos en 2016 fueron merope-nem y amoxicilina/clavulánico, seguidos de cipro-floxacino y piperacilina/tazobactam. Sin embargo, en 2020 meropenem y amoxicilina/clavulánico, aunque con valores más bajos, continúan siendo los más empleados, mientras que ciprofloxacino pasa a ser uno de los menos consumidos.Conclusiones: El análisis de DDD/100 e-d en la UCI es una herramienta útil para monitorizar el con-sumo de antimicrobianos y ver las tendencias de consumos, lo que permitirá implementar medidas que promuevan el uso racional y seguro de estos fármacos. (AU)

Objective: Monitoring the consumption of anti-microbials in hospitals is a necessary measure to evaluate the rational use of these drugs. The main indicator to carry out this monitoring and to know the pressure or exposure of antimicrobials at the hospital level is the defined daily dose (DDD) for every 100 stays and day (s-d). The main objective is to analyze the evolution of the use of antibiotics in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of a second level hospital over 5 years. Methods: It was carried out an observational, retrospective study that analyzes the consumption of antibiotics in the ICU, making a comparison with the global data of the hospital, using DDD/100 s-d as the unit of measurement.Results: 28 drugs were included, corresponding to 25 active ingredients. The mean global hospital consumption was 67.98; rising to 89.17 in the ICU. There was a trend towards reductions in consump-tion until 2020, when antibiotics such as azithromy-cin or ceftriaxone stand out. In the ICU, the most consumed drugs in 2016 were meropenem and amoxicillin/clavulanate, followed by ciprofloxacin and piperacillin/tazobactam. However, in 2020, meropenem and amoxicillin/clavulanate, in spite of showing lower values, continued to be the most used ones, while ciprofloxacin became one of the least used.Conclusions: The analysis of DDD/100 s-d in the ICU is a useful tool to monitor the consumption of antimicrobials and see consumption trends, which will allow the implementation of measures that promote the rational and safe use of these drugs. (AU)

Neonatal ICU antibiotic use trends within an integrated delivery network.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is a need for robust antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) in the neonatal population. This study's objectives were to assess neonatal antibiotic use practices over an extended period across an integrated delivery network (IDN), including six Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), to identify those most successful practices reducing use rates. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including 15,015 NICU admissions from an integrated delivery network, across six hospitals over eight years (50% Level III and 50% Level II) computing antibiotic use rates (AURs) stratified by usage: in the first few days of the stay vs. later in the stay and by gestational age. Several metrics were examined for assumptions of strong correlation with AUR: (1) the percentage of infants given antibiotics early in their stays and (2) durations of courses of antibiotics. RESULTS: Results conclude a wide variation in AURs and trends that these rates followed over time. However, there was a decrease in overall AUR from 15.7-16.6 to 10.1-10.8%, with four of the six NICUs recording statistically significant reductions in AUR vs. their first year of measurement. Specifically, the level III NICUs overall AUR decreases from 15.1-16.22 to 8.6-9.4%, and level II NICUs overall AUR 20.3-24.4 to 14.1-16.1%. A particularly successful level II NICU decreased its AUR from 22.9-30.6 to 5.9-9.4%. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to utilize data analytics at an IDN level to identify trends in AUR, We have identified practices that allowed an institution to reduce NICU AURs significantly, and which, if done as a standard practice, could be replicated on a broader scale.

The 2018 Global Point Prevalence Survey of antimicrobial consumption and resistance in 47 Canadian hospitals: a cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Patient-level surveillance of antimicrobial use (AMU) in Canadian hospitals empowers the reduction of inappropriate AMU and was piloted in 2017 among 14 hospitals in Canada. We aimed to describe AMU on the basis of patient-level data in Canadian hospitals in 2018 in terms of antimicrobial prescribing prevalence and proportions, antimicrobial indications, and agent selection in medical, surgical and intensive care wards. METHODS: Canadian adult, pediatric and neonatal hospitals were invited to participate in the standardized web-based cross-sectional Global Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance (Global-PPS) conducted in 2018. An identified site administrator assigned all wards admitting inpatients to specific surveyors. A physician, pharmacist or nurse with infectious disease training performed the survey. The primary outcomes were point prevalence rates for AMU over the study period regarding prescriptions, indications and agent selection in medical, surgical and intensive care wards. The secondary outcomes were AMU for resistant organisms and practice appropriateness evaluated on the basis of quality indicators. Antimicrobial consumption is presented in terms of prevalence and proportions. RESULTS: Forty-seven of 118 (39.8%) hospitals participated in the survey; 9 hospitals were primary care centres, 15 were secondary care centres and 23 were tertiary or specialized care centres. Of 13 272 patients included, 33.5% (n = 4447) received a total of 6525 antimicrobials. Overall, 74.1% (4832/6525) of antimicrobials were for therapeutic use, 12.6% (n = 825) were for medical prophylaxis, 8.9% (n = 578) were for surgical prophylaxis, 2.2% (n = 143) were for other use and 2.3% (n = 147) were for unidentified reasons. A diagnosis or indication was documented in the patient's file at the initiation for 87.3% (n = 5699) of antimicrobials; 62.9% (n = 4106) of antimicrobials had a stop or review date; and 72.0% (n = 4697) of prescriptions were guided by local guidelines. INTERPRETATION: Overall, three-quarters of AMU was for therapeutic use across participating hospitals. Canadian hospitals should be further incentivized to create and adapt local guidelines on the basis of recent antimicrobial resistance data.

Antimicrobial stewardship in the Western Cape: A situational analysis of existing facility-level initiatives.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing problem worldwide. With the current occurrence of pan-resistant bacterial infections and a paucity of novel antimicrobials in development, the world has entered a post-antibiotic era, in which previously treatable, common infections can become fatal. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), defined as 'co-ordinated interventions to ensure appropriate and rational use of antimicrobials', aims to decrease rates of AMR. OBJECTIVES: To co-ordinate AMS in Western Cape Province. The National Department of Health (NDoH) has identified AMS as a key strategic objective, and the Western Cape has formed a provincial AMS committee. However, not much is known regarding current AMS activities in health facilities in the province. METHODS: A self-administered, email questionnaire was sent to specific staff at all district, regional and tertiary hospitals in the 6 health districts of the Western Cape - 47 facilities in total, of which 35 (74.4%) responded. Respondents included pharmacists, managers, doctors, nurses, infection prevention and control practitioners, as well as quality assurance practitioners. The number of facilities implementing AMS were determined, as well as the composition of AMS committees and the nature and frequency of team activities. Barriers to facility-level AMS were explored. Support and outreach activities were assessed, as well as facilities' needs and expectations of the provincial AMS committee. RESULTS: Approximately half of all responding hospitals (n=19; 54.3%) had active AMS committees. Double the proportion of metropolitan (83.3%) than rural facilities (39.1%) had committees. Stewardship activities included antimicrobial prescription chart reviews and audits, AMS ward rounds, antimicrobial restriction policies and training. Most committees included a pharmacist and an infection prevention and control practitioner. More than a third of hospitals (36.1%) did not review their antimicrobial consumption data on a regular basis. Just over half of the hospitals (n=18; 51.4%) did not review AMR patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the need for effective AMS, there is limited information on AMS in South Africa. Most assistance is required in rural areas and smaller hospitals with low numbers of staff and greater numbers of transient rotating junior staff. Information management support, multidisciplinary teamwork and clinical governance are required to enable regular and ongoing AMS in facilities. Rural and smaller facilities require greater support to establish effectively functioning AMS committees.

Antibacterial prescription and the associated factors among outpatients diagnosed with respiratory tract infections in Mbarara Municipality, Uganda.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory tract infections (RTI) are the second most frequent diagnosis after Malaria amongst Outpatients in Uganda. Majority are Non pneumonia cough and flu which are self-limiting and often do not require antibacterials. However, antibiotics are continuously prescribed for these conditions and are a major contributor to antimicrobial resistance and wastage of health resources. Little is known about this problem in Uganda hence the impetus for the study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the antibacterial prescribing rate and associated factors among RTI outpatients in Mbarara municipality METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study on records of RTI outpatients from 1st April 2019 to 31st March 2020 (prior to the novel corona virus disease pandemic) in four selected public health facilities within Mbarara municipality. A pretested data caption tool was used to capture prescribing patterns using WHO/INRUD prescribing indicators. We used logistic regression to determine factors associated to antibacterial prescribing. RESULTS: A total of 780 encounters were studied with adults (18-59 years) forming the largest proportion of age categories at (337, 43.15%) and more females (444, 56.85%) than men (337, 43.15%). The antibacterial prescribing rate was 77.6% (606) with Amoxicillin the most prescribed 80.4% (503). The prescribing pattern showed an average of 2.47 (sd 0.72) drugs per encounter and the percentage of encounters with injection at 1.5% (24). Drugs prescribed by generic (1557, 79%) and drugs prescribed from essential medicine list (1650, 84%) both not conforming to WHO/INRUD standard; an indicator of possible irrational prescribing. Female gender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: (1.06-2.16); 18-59 years age group (aOR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.09-2.33) and Individuals prescribed at least three drugs were significantly more likely to have an antibacterial prescribed (aOR= 2.72, 95% CI: 1.86-3.98). CONCLUSION: The study found a high antibacterial prescribing rate especially among patients with URTI, polypharmacy and non-conformity to both essential medicine list and generic name prescribing. This prescribing pattern does not comply with rational drug use policy and needs to be addressed through antimicrobial stewardship interventions, prescriber education on rational drug use and carrying out more research to determine the appropriateness of antibacterial prescribed.

Carbapenem stewardship program in a French university children's hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Carbapenems, last-resort antibiotics, are widely used as first-line treatment in patients carrying extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) Enterobacteriaceae, including in a pediatric setting. We aimed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) to improve the use of carbapenems. METHODS: We implemented an ASP at the Bordeaux Children's University Hospital with 6-month audits on prescribing practice before and after an intervention (revision of antibiotic treatment protocols, a half-day educational session with feedback of the first study period). The number of carbapenem prescriptions was analyzed and two criteria were used to assess conformity of the indication for carbapenem prescription and conformity of the reassessment. A logistic regression was used to assess the overall compliance of carbapenem prescriptions over the two periods adjusted for ESBL carriage. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients were included with 37 carbapenem prescriptions before the intervention and 23 after. Overall carbapenem consumption decreased from 0.54 prescriptions per 100 admissions to 0.32 (p = 0.06). Conformity increased during the study for indication (46-87%, p = 0.004) and for reassessment (48-78%, p = 0.04) and was significantly associated with the second study period, after adjustment for ESBL carriage. CONCLUSION: Our intervention contributed to a significant improvement in the compliance to indications for carbapenem indication and in the reassessment of the prescription.

Assessing Antimicrobial Resistance, Utilization, and Stewardship in Yemen: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), largely driven by irrational use of antimicrobials, is a global, multifaceted problem calling for a complete understanding of all contributory factors for effective containment. In conflict settings, war-wounds and malnutrition can combine with existing social determinants to increase demand for antibiotics, compounding irrational use. In this study, we focus on Yemen, a low-income country with active conflict for the last 5 years, and analyze the current status of awareness and stewardship efforts regarding AMR. We performed a survey of prescribers/physicians and pharmacists to describe perceptions of AMR prevalence, antibiotic use practices, and stewardship in Yemen, supported by a nonsystematic scoping literature review and a key informant interview. Participants (96%, N = 54) reported a perceived high AMR prevalence rate. Prescribers (74%, 20/27) reported pressure to prescribe broad-spectrum antibiotics. In the majority of cases (81%, 22/27), antimicrobial sensitivity tests (AST) were not performed to inform antibiotic choice. The main barrier to AST was cost. Most pharmacists (67%, 18/27) sold antibiotics without prescriptions. Amoxicillin (including amoxicillin-clavulanate) was the most-commonly prescribed (63%, 17/27) or dispensed (81%, 22/27) antibiotic. AST was rated the least important solution to AMR in Yemen. While there was awareness of a high AMR rate, stewardship is poor in Yemen. We note that barriers to the use of AST could be addressed through the deployment of reliable, affordable, quality rapid diagnostics, and AST kits. Compulsory continuing education emphasizing the use of AST to guide prescribing and patients' awareness programs could help avoid irrational use.

Audit of empirical antibiotic therapy for sepsis and the impact of early multidisciplinary consultation on patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To perform an audit of empirical antibiotic therapy (EAT) of sepsis at the emergency department and to analyse the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programme on process and patient outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, single-centre cohort study including patients with sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score ≥2 from whom blood cultures were taken was conducted between February 2019 and April 2020. EAT was assessed using eight applicable inpatient quality indicators (IQIs) for responsible antibiotic use. Patient outcomes were hospital length-of-stay (LOS), ICU admission, ICU LOS, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: The audit included 900 sepsis episodes in 803 patients. Full guideline adherence regarding choice and dosing was 45.9%; adherence regarding choice alone was 68.1%. EAT was active against all likely pathogens in 665/787 (84.5%) episodes. In the guideline non-adherent group, choice of EAT was inappropriate in 122/251 (48.6%) episodes. Changes within 3 days occurred in 335/900 (37.2%) episodes. Treating physicians changed administration route more often, whereas microbiological/infectious disease (ID)/AMS consultant advice resulted in de-escalation and discontinuation (P = 0.000). Guideline-adherent choice was associated with significantly shorter LOS (6 (4-11) vs. 8 (5-15) days). Full adherence was associated with significantly lower mortality (23 (6.4%) vs. 48 (11.3%)) and shorter LOS (6 (4-10) vs. 8 (5-14) days). CONCLUSION: Five global quality indicators of EAT were measurable in routine clinical practice. Full adherence to guidelines was only moderate. Adherence to guidelines was associated with better patient outcomes.

Impact of a mobile decision support tool on antimicrobial stewardship indicators in St. John's, Canada.

OBJECTIVES: Inappropriate antibiotic use contributes to antimicrobial resistance. The SpectrumTM app provides antibiotic decision support, based on local antimicrobial resistance rates. We determined the impact of regional implementation of the app on inpatient antimicrobial appropriateness, inpatient antimicrobial usage (AMU), population-based Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) rates and cost, using a retrospective, before and after quasi-experimental design, including a one-year study period. METHODS: The SpectrumTM app was released to prescribers in February, 2019. We performed two one-day inpatient point prevalence surveys using the National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey tool, six months before (June 25, 2018) and six months after (June 25, 2019) app dissemination. Inpatient AMU in Defined Daily Dose/1000 patient days and CDI incidence were compared, before and after app dissemination. RESULTS: The pre-survey included 184 prescriptions, and the post-survey included 197 prescriptions. Appropriateness was 97/176 (55.1%) pre, and 126/192 (65.6%) post (+10.5%, p = 0.051). Inpatient AMU declined by 6.6 DDD/1000 patient days per month, and CDI declined by 0.3 cases per month. Cost savings associated with reduced AMU were $403.98/bed/year and associated with reduced CDI were $82,078/year. CONCLUSION: We observed improvement in antimicrobial stewardship indicators following SpectrumTM implementation. We cannot determine the cause of these improvements.

Improving urinary tract infection treatment through a multifaceted antimicrobial stewardship intervention in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is frequently encountered in the emergency department (ED). We assessed an antibiotic stewardship intervention tailored for the ED. The primary objective was improving overall adherence to agent choice and treatment duration. The secondary objective was a decrease in fluoroquinolone prescription. METHODS: This pre-post study included patients discharged from the ED with a UTI diagnosis. The intensive intervention period lasted three months and involved dissemination of guidelines, short lectures, incorporation of order sets into electronic ED charts and weekly personal audit and feedback. The following 11-month phase was a booster period consisting of monthly text messages of the treatment protocol. Assessment of adherence to the protocol was compared between the three-month pre-intervention period and the last two months of the intensive intervention period, as well as with the last two months of the booster period. RESULTS: A total of 177 patients were included in the pre-intervention period, 156 in the intervention period, and 94 in the late follow-up assessing the booster period. Median age was 49 (18-94) years, 78.2% were female, 84.8% had cystitis. During the intervention period, protocol adherence with antibiotic selection and duration increased from 41% to 84% (p < 0.001). Adherence remained high in the late follow-up period (73.4% vs. 41%, p < 0.001). Fluoroquinolone use decreased from 19.1% pre-intervention, to 5% in the intervention and 7.4% in the late follow-up periods (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: An antibiotic stewardship intervention in a busy ED resulted in adherence to treatment protocols, including a decrease in fluoroquinolone use. A monthly reminder preserved most of the effect for a year.

Antibiotic prescription practices and opinions regarding antimicrobial resistance among veterinarians in Kentucky, USA.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate antimicrobial use (AMU) is a global concern. Opinions of veterinarians regarding AMU and its role in the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) may influence their prescription practices. It is important to understand these opinions, prescription practices and their potential impact on the development of AMR in order to guide efforts to curb the problem. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial prescription practices and opinions of veterinarians in Kentucky regarding AMU and AMR. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a 30-question survey questionnaire administered to veterinarians who were members of the Kentucky Veterinary Medical Association. Survey responses from 101 participants were included in the study. Descriptive statistics were computed and associations between categorical variables assessed using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Firth logistic models were used to investigate predictors of "Compliance with prescription policies" and "Cost of antimicrobial affects prescription decisions". RESULTS: Almost all (93%) respondents indicated that improper AMU contributed to selection for AMR. A total of 52% of the respondents believed that antimicrobials were appropriately prescribed, while the remaining 48% believed that antimicrobials were inappropriately prescribed. Significant predictors of compliance with prescription policies were availability of prescription policy at the veterinary facility (Odds Ratio (OR) = 4.2; p<0.001) and over-prescription (OR = 0.35; p = 0.025). Similarly, significant predictors of cost of antimicrobials affecting prescription decisions were lack of post-graduate training (OR = 8.3; p = 0.008) and practice type, with large animal practices having significantly lower odds of the outcome (OR = 0.09; p = 0.004) than small animal practices. CONCLUSION: Most veterinarians indicated that improper AMU contributed to selection for AMR. Since the odds of compliance with prescription policies were 4-times higher among veterinarians working at facilities that had prescription policies compared to those at facilities that didn't, more veterinary facilities should be encouraged to adopt prescription policies to help improve compliance and reduce AMR. Veterinarians would also benefit from continued professional education to help improve prescription practices, antimicrobial stewardship and curb AMR.

Effect of population inflow and outflow between rural and urban areas on regional antimicrobial use surveillance.

PURPOSE: Regional-level measures can complement national antimicrobial stewardship programs. In Japan, sub-prefectural regions called secondary medical areas (SMAs) provide general inpatient care within their borders, and regional antimicrobial stewardship measures are frequently implemented at this level. There is therefore a need to conduct antimicrobial use (AMU) surveillance at this level to ascertain antimicrobial consumption. However, AMU estimates are generally standardized to residence-based nighttime populations, which do not account for population mobility across regional borders. We examined the impact of population in/outflow on SMA-level AMU estimates by comparing the differences between standardization using daytime and nighttime populations. METHODS: We obtained AMU information from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan. AMU was quantified at the prefectural and SMA levels using the number of defined daily doses (DDDs) divided by (a) 1,000 nighttime population per day or (b) 1,000 daytime population per day. We identified and characterized the discrepancies between the two types of estimates at the prefectural and SMA levels. RESULTS: The national AMU was 17.21 DDDs per 1,000 population per day. The mean (95% confidence interval) prefectural-level DDDs per 1,000 nighttime and daytime population per day were 17.27 (14.10, 20.44) and 17.41 (14.30, 20.53), respectively. The mean (95% confidence interval) SMA-level DDDs per 1,000 nighttime and daytime population per day were 16.12 (9.84, 22.41) and 16.41 (10.57, 22.26), respectively. The nighttime population-standardized estimates were generally higher than the daytime population-standardized estimates in urban areas, but lower in the adjacent suburbs. Large differences were observed in the main metropolitan hubs in eastern and western Japan. CONCLUSION: Regional-level AMU estimates, especially of smaller regions such as SMAs, are susceptible to the use of different populations for standardization. This finding indicates that AMU standardization based on population values is not suitable for AMU estimates in small regions.

Antimicrobial stewardship in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based cohort study and interrupted time-series analysis.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has altered the context for antimicrobial stewardship in primary care. AIM: To assess the effect of the pandemic on antibiotic prescribing, accounting for changes in consultations for respiratory and urinary tract infections (RTIs/UTIs). DESIGN AND SETTING: Population-based cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD database from January 2017 to September 2020. METHOD: Interrupted time-series analysis evaluated changes in antibiotic prescribing and RTI/UTI consultations adjusting for age, sex, season, and secular trends. The authors assessed the proportion of COVID-19 episodes associated with antibiotic prescribing. RESULTS: There were 253 655 registered patients in 2017 and 232 218 in 2020, with 559 461 antibiotic prescriptions, 216 110 RTI consultations, and 36 402 UTI consultations. Compared with prepandemic months, March 2020 was associated with higher antibiotic prescribing (adjusted rate ratio [ARR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11 to 1.16). Antibiotic prescribing fell below predicted rates between April and August 2020, reaching a minimum in May (ARR 0.73; 95% CI = 0.71 to 0.75). Pandemic months were associated with lower rates of RTI/UTI consultations, particularly in April for RTIs (ARR 0.23; 95% CI = 0.22 to 0.25). There were small reductions in the proportion of RTI consultations with antibiotic prescribed and no reduction for UTIs. Among 25 889 COVID-19 patients, 2942 (11%) had antibiotics within a COVID-19 episode. CONCLUSION: Pandemic months were initially associated with increased antibiotic prescribing, which then fell below expected levels during the national lockdown. Findings are reassuring that antibiotic stewardship priorities have not been neglected because of COVID-19. Research is required into the effects of reduced RTI/UTI consultations on incidence of serious bacterial infections.

The point prevalence and inappropriateness of antibiotic use at hospitals in Turkey: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Inappropriate antimicrobial use is a key problem causing antimicrobial resistance and increased health care costs. Although global point prevalence surveys on antimicrobial prescribing in hospitals were described, there is lack of data from Turkish hospitals. Here, we aimed to perform systematic review and meta-analysis for the point prevalence surveys on antimicrobial prescribing in Turkish hospitals. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline was used to identify studies for the review. Articles published between January 2004 and September 2020 by Turkish investigators were included if they used the point prevalence survey method. The Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool and the World Health Organization's point prevalence survey tool were used to the evaluate studies. Results were combined using random effects meta-analysis. The pooled point prevalence of antimicrobial use in Turkish hospitals was 48% (95% confidence interval 43-54). There was considerable heterogeneity in prevalence among the studies (I2= 98.75 %, 95 % CI 98.49-98-97). The most commonly prescribed antimicrobial and indication for antimicrobial use were third generation cephalosporins (36%) and respiratory tract infections (88%), respectively. More than two thirds of the antimicrobials were prescribed empirically (median: 71% [interquartile range: 56-80]) in hospitals. The point prevalence and inappropriateness of antimicrobial use are high in Turkish hospitals. Turkey is one of the biggest consumers of antimicrobials. There is an urgent need for antimicrobial stewardship programmes at Turkish hospitals to improve antimicrobial prescribing. Our study findings can contribute to improving antimicrobial prescribing, and thereby control antimicrobial resistance.

An efficient cephalosporin stewardship programme in French swine production.

By 2010, systems set up to monitor the antimicrobial resistance of pathogenic bacteria and antimicrobial usage identified a sustained increase regarding third- and fourth-generation cephalosporin resistance in French pig production. This sector mobilised and collectively committed to responsible action in the following months. This led to a multi-professional voluntary stewardship programme that was started in 2011. A consensus of veterinary opinion led to the definition of restrictive rules on the prescription of the third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins targeted by the antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP). All pig sector professionals, including farmers, were informed. Existing monitoring systems for usage and resistance were supplemented by data from the records of veterinarians' cephalosporin deliveries and from individual pig farm surveys investigating antimicrobial usage. The second step, from 2014, entailed regulatory measures that consolidated the programme by setting quantitative reduction objectives and specifying the terms and conditions for prescribing and dispensing a list of critical antimicrobial molecules including cephalosporins. All the data sources confirmed a significant fall of more than 90% in cephalosporin usage in the French pig production sector between 2010 and 2016. Monitoring systems recorded that the resistance of commensal and pathogenic Escherichia coli isolates also tended to decrease over the same period. The stewardship programme proved highly effective in reducing usage and containing resistance, illustrating the efficiency of a well-defined multi-professional strategy.

Effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on antimicrobial prevalence and prescribing in a tertiary hospital in Singapore.

BACKGROUND: The deployment of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) teams to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic can lead to a loss of developed frameworks, best practices and leadership resulting in adverse impact on antimicrobial prescribing and resistance. We aim to investigate effects of reduction in AMS resources during the COVID-19 pandemic on antimicrobial prescribing. METHODS: One of 5 full-time equivalent AMS pharmacists was deployed to support pandemic work and AMS rounds with infectious disease physicians were reduced from 5 to 2 times a week. A survey in acute inpatients was conducted using the Global Point Prevalence Survey methodology in July 2020 and compared with those in 2015 and 2017-2019. RESULTS: The prevalence of antimicrobial prescribing (55% in 2015 to 49% in 2019 and 47% in 2020, p = 0.02) and antibacterials (54% in 2015 to 45% in 2019 and 42% in 2020, p < 0.01) have been reducing despite the pandemic. Antimicrobial prescribing in infectious disease wards with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases was 29% in 2020. Overall, antimicrobial prescribing quality indicators continued to improve (e.g. reasons in notes, 91% in 2015 to 94% in 2019 and 97% in 2020, p < 0.01) or remained stable (compliance to guideline, 71% in 2015 to 62% in 2019 and 73% in 2020, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was no increase in antimicrobial prescribing and no significant differences in antimicrobial prescribing quality indicators.

Appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in ambulatory care in China: a nationwide descriptive database study.

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate antibiotic use greatly accelerates antimicrobial resistance. The appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions is well evaluated, using big observational data, in some high-income countries, whereas the evidence of this appropriateness is scarce in China. We aimed to assess the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in ambulatory care settings in China to inform future antimicrobial stewardship. METHODS: We used data from the Beijing Data Center for Rational Use of Drugs, which was a national database designed for monitoring rationality of drug use. 139 hospitals that uploaded diagnosis and prescription information were included from 28 provincial-level regions of mainland China. Outpatient prescriptions were classified as appropriate, potentially appropriate, inappropriate, or not linked to any diagnosis for antibiotic use by following a published classification scheme. Antibiotic prescription rates for various diagnosis categories and proportions of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions for different subgroups were estimated. Antibiotic prescribing patterns and proportions of individual antibiotics prescribed for different diagnosis categories were analysed and reported. FINDINGS: Between Oct 1, 2014, and April 30, 2018, 18 848 864 (10·9%) of 172 704 117 outpatient visits ended with antibiotic prescriptions. For conditions for which antibiotic use was appropriate, potentially appropriate, and inappropriate, 42·2%, 30·6%, and 7·6% of visits were associated with antibiotic prescriptions, respectively. Of all 18 848 864 antibiotic prescriptions, 9 689 937 (51·4%) were inappropriate, 5 354 224 (28·4%) were potentially appropriate, 2 893 102 (15·3%) were appropriate, and 911 601 (4·8%) could not be linked to any diagnosis. A total of 23 266 494 individual antibiotics were prescribed, of which 18 620 086 (80·0%) were broad-spectrum and the top four most prescribed antibiotics were third-generation cephalosporins (5 056 058 [21·7%]), second-generation cephalosporins (3 823 410 [16·4%]), macrolides (3 554 348 [15·3%]), and fluoroquinolones (3 285 765 [14·1%]). INTERPRETATION: Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing was highly prevalent nationwide in China. Over half of the antibiotic prescriptions were inappropriate in secondary-level and tertiary-level hospitals, suggesting an urgent need for outpatient antibiotic stewardship aimed at optimising antibiotic prescribing to achieve the goals set in China's 2016 national action plan to contain antimicrobial resistance. FUNDING: The National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Using ceftazidime-avibactam for persistent carbapenem-resistant Serratia marcescens infection highlights antimicrobial stewardship challenges with new beta-lactam-inhibitor combination antibiotics.

The newer beta-lactam-inhibitor combination (BLIC) antibiotics are available in South Africa (SA) for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections. We describe the successful use of ceftazidime-avibactam (CA) for the treatment of a child with persistent carbapenem-resistant Serratia marcescens bacteraemia, and the challenges faced using this lifesaving antibiotic, including access to susceptibility testing, procurement process, cost and complexity of deciding when, how and for how long to use it. Furthermore, the burden of carbapenem resistance is increasing in SA, and inappropriate use of CA and other newer BLIC antibiotics, such as ceftolozane-tazobactam, will inevitably endanger their longevity. A careful balance must be struck between removing unnecessary obstacles and delays in initiating these antibiotics for life-threatening infections, and additional antimicrobial stewardship-guided interventions aimed at preserving their therapeutic use.

Evaluating an antimicrobial stewardship programme implemented in an intensive care unit of a large academic hospital, using the RE-AIM framework.

BACKGROUND: The threat of antimicrobial resistance driven by inappropriate and unnecessary use of antimicrobials is a global issue of great concern. Evidence-based approaches to optimising antimicrobial prescribing to improve patient care while reducing the rate of antimicrobial resistance continue to be implemented worldwide. However, the successes or failures of implementation of such approaches are seldom evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of an implemented antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) in reducing the spread of antimicrobial resistance in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a large academic hospital using the RE-AIM framework. METHODS: A descriptive quasi-experimental study was conducted with adult patients who had been admitted to the ICU of an academic hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. Data were extracted from patients' records using a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics of four RE-AIM dimensions (reach, effectiveness, adoption and implementation) and the overall impact of the implemented antimicrobial stewardship programme were calculated. RESULTS: From the 59 participant records, 21 patients (35.6%) developed hospital-acquired infections and all were prescribed antimicrobials during their stay in the ICU. Twenty-seven pathogens (bacterial species) were isolated from samples acquired from the patients, including Staphylococcus aureus (n=6; 22.2%), Escherichia coli (n=4; 14.8%), Acinetobacter baumannii (n=4; 14.8%) and Streptococcus pnuemoniae (n=3; 11.11%), as well as 10 other bacterial species (37.0%) including Corynebacterium species, Enterococcus faecium, Haemophilus influenzae, Klebsiella species, Clostridium difficile and Salmonella species. Of the 27 pathogens isolated, 19 (70.4 %) were resistant to the prescribed antimicrobials. The overall impact of the ASP implemented in the studied facility was 67.2%. CONCLUSIONS: An ASP requires both thorough implementation and leadership support to have an impact in the reduction of antimicrobial resistance. Lack of leadership support poses a significant challenge to sustainability. There is an urgent need for behavioural change in hospital leadership.